Evaluation of the Factors behind the Failure of Project Management Practices

Authors

  • Rizwan Shabbir M.Phil. Scholar, Business & Management Sciences Department of The Superior University Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Prof. Dr. Engr. Shahid Naveed Professor, Business & Management Sciences Department of The Superior University Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Dr. Shahan Mehmood Cheema Assistant Professor, Business & Management Sciences Department of The Superior University Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-III)47

Keywords:

Corporate Culture, Failure, Leadership, Organizations, Project Management, Risk Management

Abstract

Organizations intend to use best practices in management of the projects to ensure the desired results. Despite applying practical project management principles, many initiatives fail to achieve their goals. In this article the factors contributing to the failure of project management methods have been studied. Organizations can enhance their project management procedures and increase the possibility of project success by identifying and analyzing such elements. The comprehensive literature review and case studies along with detailed interviews with experts led to identification these factors. A multitude of significant factors contributed to the problem. The issues are poor planning, ineffective communication, scope disruptions, insufficient resource allocation, and inadequate risk management.: In addition factors including corporate culture, leadership, and stakeholder engagement substantially impact project performance were studied. Various suggestions for enhancing project management techniques and to decrease the likelihood of project failure were identified.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-27

Details

    Abstract Views: 731
    PDF Downloads: 397

How to Cite

Shabbir, R., Naveed, S., & Cheema, S. M. (2023). Evaluation of the Factors behind the Failure of Project Management Practices. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(3), 490–501. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-III)47

Most read articles by the same author(s)