The Detailing of First Information Reports (F.I.R.) in Winning the Convictions: An Analysis in the Light of Case Laws

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine as to how adherence to or otherwise in detailing while drafting the First Information Report (F.I.R.) affects the judgments of the Courts. Although F.I.R. is not a basic evidence with regard to criminal investigations, but failings in mentioning timeliness, questionable identification, and factual material documentation in FIR often proves it’s importance in adjudications. In this study doctrinal legal research approach was adopted to analyze the judgments of apex Courts of Pakistan. By using qualitative thematic analysis, the study examined these judgments across following key dimensions i.e. mentioning of the light source at the place of offence, detailed description of accused, well accurate timeliness in the registration of the FIR and in currency related cases precision with regard to the recovery of currency notes. Procedural integrity while drafting FIRs was found to be as a decisive factor, e.g.unjustified delays in recording FIRs will lead to create suspicion of fabrication (Hussain v. State, 1999), on the other hand excessive quick filings without plausible detail imply a concocted prosecution story (Kachkool v. State, 2002). Similarly unspecified role of accused with unclear body or facial descriptions weakens subsequent identification parade (Yaseer Naveed vs. State, 2013). Not mentioning light sources in night time crimes (Mansoor Ahmad v. State, 2012) as well as inaccurate denomination of currency notes in cash recovery cases (Maqsud Ahmad v. State, 2012), resultantly lead in evidence exclusion and acquittals. By implementing the uniform reporting format for FIRs, these will be converted from a mere administrative formality to a credible initial record of facts, ensuring the protection of the rights of the accused, improving the effectiveness of investigations, and boosting public confidence in the legal system.