A Comparative Analysis of Public Service Recruitment Criteria: Early Islamic Public Administration VS Pakistan’s Public Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2025(6-I)62Keywords:
Islamic Public Administration, Recruitment, Merit-Based System, Ethics, Religion, Philosophy, Orientation, ColonialismAbstract
This study reveals an in-depth comparative analysis of public service recruitment criteria between early Islamic Public administration Pakistan’s and current public administration. With rise in colonialism in 18th century, Islamic empire began to shrink. In reaction, the interest in Islamic principles of governance within modern frameworks took a revival with various political and economic challenges. A critical review of the two foundational texts outlines core Islamic recruitment system of public servants (civil service not named then) extracted from narrations is found in the text. For Pakistan, government manuals and articles have been researched. The comparison identifies Islamic system being established on Amanah, ethics and accountability through active public involvement. Western practices prioritize merit-based system and competence towards their systemic objectives. Pakistan appears as a hybrid system of both Islamic and Western, inclining for the deep-rooted colonial practices of bureaucracy. Muslim countries can use these ideological, systemic and individual factors to revitalize moral components for recruitment in governance.
Downloads
Published
Details
-
Abstract Views: 7
PDF Downloads: 0
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Development and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

ORIENTS SOCIAL RESEARCH CONSULTANCY (OSRC) & Journal of Development and Social Sciences (JDSS) adheres to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. The authors submitting and publishing in JDSS agree to the copyright policy under creative common license 4.0 (Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International license). Under this license, the authors published in JDSS retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially. All other authors using the content of JDSS are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work. Therefore, ORIENTS SOCIAL RESEARCH CONSULTANCY (OSRC) & Journal of Development and Social Sciences (JDSS) follow an Open Access Policy for copyright and licensing.
