U.S.-China Trade Policies Under the Biden Administration: A Critical Analysis

Authors

  • Aliza Khalil M.Phil. Scholar, Department of International Relations, Government College University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Qurat ul Ain Shahid MS Strategic Studies, Air University Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Dr. Imran Wakil Assistant Professor (OPS), Department of International Relations, Government College University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2025(6-I)19

Keywords:

Biden Administration, Economic Nationalism, Global Supply Chains, Strategic Competition, U.S.-China Trade

Abstract

This study looks at how relations between the United States and China have changed under the Biden administration. It draws attention to Biden's stance on current tariffs, prospective new discussions, and their effects on technology and global supply lines. A constant shift has been seen in US trade policies in 20th century for balancing economic priorities, political alignments and global dynamics. There’s been a divide among republicans and democrats over trade policies, republicans favored high tariffs before 1960s and advocated free trade post 1960s while democrats advocated lower tariffs pre 1960s and leaned toward protectionism in post 1960s. A bipartisan emerged in 2016 under Donald Trump administration to counter Chinese influence and high tariffs were imposed under section 301 of U.S. Trade Act of 1974. The study uses a qualitative methodology to examine how Biden's policies affect economic situations and bilateral ties. Biden's administration seeks to rebalance U.S.-China relations within a framework of economic security and international collaboration, according to the literature assessment, which also addresses topics of economic nationalism and strategic competitiveness.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-24

Details

    Abstract Views: 122
    PDF Downloads: 111

How to Cite

Khalil, A., Shahid, Q. ul A., & Wakil, I. (2025). U.S.-China Trade Policies Under the Biden Administration: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 6(1), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2025(6-I)19